1. Mailing Lists
  2. Accounting
  3. Re: [15042] Reasoning on missing parents in analytic accounts

Accounting mailing list archives

accounting@odoo-community.org

Browse archives

Re: [15042] Reasoning on missing parents in analytic accounts

Re: [15042] Reasoning on missing parents in analytic accounts

Avatar

Re: [15042] Reasoning on missing parents in analytic accounts

by
ForgeFlow, S.L., Jordi Ballester Alomar
- 17/02/2017 18:19:41
Hi, 

The hierarchy is not needed in accounting because the chart of account has limited scope, whereas for projects you can have hundreds of projects, 7 levels deep.

You would need to design one report for each project, which seems to be impractical.




On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Nhomar Hernandez [Vauxoo] <nhomar@vauxoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Frederik Kramer <frederik.kramer@initos.com> wrote:
Just my 50 cent. I am currently evaluating whether we really need hierarchy here but i think for proper internal analysis of a companies figures, "tags" are just not enough.

If you understand this concept all is easier to understand (and I must accept easier to mainatin and implement).

- "Hierarchy is a way of see the data, it is not mandatory to have the date on that way, then hierarchy is a report not a datamodel"

I am one of the bigger defenders of Hierarchy whenever it is needed, BUT in accounting it happens that with some programming you can have it at report level perfectly.

We did it for Mexico and it works pretty well.

Nhomar Hernandez
CEO Vauxoo.
Twitter: @nhomar
Odoo Gold Partner
Skype: nhomar00 (Envia mail previo no lo superviso siempre).
Móvil Venezuela:
+58 4144110269
Móvil México:
+52 1 4773933942

_______________________________________________
Mailing-List: http://odoo-community.org/groups/accounting-28
Post to: mailto:accounting@odoo-community.org
Unsubscribe: http://odoo-community.org/groups?unsubscribe




--
Jordi Ballester Alomar
CEO & Founder | Eficent

Reference