Contributors mailing list archives
Re: Stock Repositories splittingby
Acsone SA/NV, Denis Roussel
In order to begin on good basis, it should be great to have new repos.
Here are again the specifications:
stock-logistics-availability: This repository contains modules to provide more information about product stock availability in terms of quantities (immediately usable, potential, unreserved ones, ...).
stock-logistics-orderpoint: This repository contains modules to extend reordering rules (available on warehouses locations) functionalities.
stock-logistics-request: This repository contains modules to provide another way of creating stock movements. Provided as a dedicated application, users will be able to create their stock needs by product and location.
stock-logistics-interfaces: This repository contains modules to manage vertical physical (such as Kardex Remstar, Modula, ...). lifts for stock internal locations.
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 10:36 AM David Beal <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Hello,On my side i never known if a module was in stock-logistics-workflow or stock-logistics-warehouseGood point to have more dedicated repositories well namedAs I see all stocks repos are prefixed stock-logistics ...Then it seems there is no added value for 'logistics' name (no help to understand the content)What if if we rename all prefix to stock only of those repositoriesI'm lazy and I prefer to write "cd stock-..." rather than "cd stock-logistics-..." all days of the yearWhat do you think about this? Not lazy on your side ?ThanksLe mer. 7 sept. 2022 à 13:42, Daniel Reis <email@example.com> a écrit :OK for me.
On 07/09/22 12:17, Roussel, Denis wrote:
No problem for stock-logistics-interfaces. You know more the coverage of those modules. But doesn't it sound a little bit too generic ?
I also thought about inventory modules. But from v15, Odoo has refactored the way inventories are done. There are currently no module of that kind in v15 branch either. Maybe we can wait and see on that one.
I'd prefer keeping the habits of people for both well known ones. Warehouse is usually for 'static' representations of flows (base objects, ...). Workflow is usually for pickings/moves behaviours.As the first aim of my request is to lower the weight of repositories, merging both is quite unwanted.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:06 PM Jacques-Etienne Baudoux <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Maybe stock-logistics-interfaces instead of stock-logistics-lift and include the measuring devices modules
And also stock-logistics-inventory ?
What about the remaining modules in stock-logistics-warehouse? It's not always clear why a module is in stock-logistics-warehouse or in stock-logistics-workflow. Shouldn't stock-logistics-warehouse then be dropped in favor of stock-logistics-workflow ?
Le mer. 7 sept. 2022 à 11:42, Simone Orsi <email@example.com> a écrit :
ah ok, well, using module names didn't sound as "new repo names" ;P
I agree w/ the remarks by Holger and Daniel then.
We could have
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:36 AM Roussel, Denis <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
@Holger of course hyphens in names
For descriptions in repos, I can do it as soon as they are created.
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 11:27 AM Holger Brunn <email@example.com> wrote:
> stock-logistics-warehouse: > stock_available > stock_orderpoint > stock_request > stock_vertical_lift I rather like hyphens in repository names instead of underscores, and all current repos do that. So I'd suggest to do it the same with the new repos. New ones are fine with me, still I think people proposing new repos should immediately provide a catchy description that can be placed to github and the oca db. -- Your partner for the hard Odoo problems https://hunki-enterprises.com
Full stack Python web developer, Odoo specialist, Odoo Community Board Member, in love with open source.
M: +351 919 991 307
A: Avenida da República 3000, Estoril Office B, #34